msgbartop
Total information about Results , movies, latest stuff latest news about india so keep visiting….
msgbarbottom




19 Jan 10 Director’s get the film copyright

The HRD ministry has come up with a bill which confers copyright of a film not just upon the producer, but also on the director. For films made after the proposed law comes into force, the producer and director will be treated jointly as the first owner of copyright. Thus, the director is finally getting his due as the creator. The joint ownership redresses an anomaly in the Copyright Act 1957, which in the case of books, confers copyright on the author leaving out the publisher but in the …

Tags: , ,

18 Jan 10 Latest Movies News and Film Reviews

The trend continues.Hollywood,like every year,is ready to release an array of movies and animation films in the beginning of New Year.Although a number of block buster movies are already showing in theaters there is no dearth of excitement among movie lovers for new releases.As per box office news some of the latest movies are making great profit with the rush of viewers in the festive season.Film magazines are full with film reviews and movie photos while Page 3 reporters are competing with each other for exclusive interviews of movie stars.If you have not updated your movie list yet here is some latest movies news for you.

Movie buffs are all charged up with the release of ‘Slumdog Millionaire’.This British drama film has already rocked the world with its touching story and excellent cinematography and causing commotion in the box office too.Director Danny Boyle is on a high with awards flowing from everywhere while exclusive interview of Slumdog Millionaire’s Jamal Mullick,Dev Patel is already being aired.This cross over film has already bagged 4 Golden Globes and five out of the six awards it won nomination for at the Critics’Choice.Millions of viewers hope this winning spree continues for Slumdog Millionaire with ten nominations at the 81st Academy Awards and eleven at 62nd BAFTA Awards.

Another release of 2009 is Defiance that has all the attributes to be enlisted among the best commercial movies of the year. The creator of The Last Samurai,Edward Zwick is back with another war film. Much acclaimed actor Daniel Craig is featuring the lead role as Tuvia Bielski.The action thriller based on the novel’ Defiance: The Bielski Partisans’ is a story of four Jewish brothers who escaped from a Nazi military base.The movie evolves round the incidents and danger the prisoners faced while escaping.The films title song ‘Defiance’ is already a hit and it won nomination for Best Original Score at the 2009 Oscar. Though the novel could be filmed more dynamically Defiance has much to offer to its viewers.

Those who love to watch off-beat films can include in their movie lists the names such as ‘The Reader’,'Doubt’,'The Curious Case of Benjamin Button’ and ‘Challenging’.'Revolutionary Road’ pairing Leonardo DiCaprio and the Kate Winslet has already acquired critics’ appraisals.Extraordinary performance of the blonde beauty in Revolutionary Road and The Reader has brought her two Golden Globes in 2009.The Reader gives you a taste of modern German classic.While portraying the complex character of a concentration camp guard,Hanna in The Reader Kate Winslet shows her class as an actor.

With the release of Revolutionary Road it was inevitable that comparisons will take place between the box office hit Titanic and this latest Leo and Kate paired movie.From the innocent teenager in Titanic to the desperate housewife in Revolutionary Road the blonde beauty has walked a long way and that shows in her performance.

Doubt is a superb screen adaptation of John Patrick Shanley’s Pulitzer and Tony Award winning drama.The movie is a quest for existential truth that enthralls its viewers with the desolating consequence of blind ‘justice’ in the epoch of ethics and moral conviction.That is where Doubt succeeds in raising questions in the mind of its audience.
The list is long.Reviews of 2009 Golden Globe winning feature films are already available on the web.Apart from film reviews websites come loaded with movie clips,movie news and photos.In addition to the latest movie releases you have a lot more coming soon.So,this year you have good reasons to rush to the theater.

Olivia Flores is a self published author and film critic.She writes English film reviews and articles on latest Hollywood movies and movie stars.For more information,she recommends you to visit: http://www.Premiere.com/Reviews.

Tags: , , , ,

18 Jan 10 “Mama Mia!” – A Fun Film – Becomes the Highest Grossing Movie Musical in History

Copyright © 2009 Ed Bagley

Mamma Mia! – 3 Stars (Good)

Every now and then a movie comes along that makes no pretense of featuring great acting, singing, directing and writing, but seeks to be only what it is—just plain fun! The most recent of these rare movies is “Mamma Mia!”, released in 2008.

Based on Abba’s hit single of the same name, Mamma Mia! first opened as a musical at the Prince Edward Theatre in London in 1999. The original Broadway production opened in 2001 at the Winter Garden Theater in New York, and has run for more than 3,100 performances through April of this year. It has now toured in more than 140 cities in America.

Mamma Mia! was nominated for Best Musical and Best Musical Score at the 2002 Tony Awards. The director of the original Broadway play, Phyllida Lloyd, is also the director of the movie. The musical book and screenplay are both by Catherine Johnson.

According to Variety, Producer Judy Craymer and writer Catherine Johnson “were broke when they first tried to put the show together . . . and now are two of the wealthiest women in England.”

That would be because Mamma Mia! set a new mark for the biggest weekend premiere ever for a movie musical–$27+ million. It also became the highest grossing film of all time in the United Kingdom, and would go on to become the highest grossing musical film worldwide, generating $610+ million with a production budget of $52 million.

Combine the movie with the stage productions and Mamma Mia! has grossed $2 billion in revenue since opening in 1999. Much of the success has to do with Abba, the Swedish pop/dance group that became one of the most internationally popular entertainment attractions from 1972 to 1982. If you do not recognize Abba, you would recognize its music.

Mamma Mia! is a treasure trove of Abba music composed by Benny Andersson and Bjorn Ulvaeus, and includes “Dancing Queen”, “Super Trouper”, Knowing Me, Knowing You”, “Take a Chance On Me”, “Thank You for the Music”, “Money, Money, Money”, “The Winner Takes It All” and “I Have a Dream”.

Mamma Mia! takes place on a Greek Island where the never-married Donna (Meryl Streep) runs a not very successful hotel with her daughter Sophie (Amanda Seyfried), who is about to be married to Sky (Dominic Cooper). Donna invites her two best friends to the wedding—Rosie (Julie Walters) and Tanya (Christine Baranski); the three of them formed a trio on stage at one time.

Sophie, who has never known who her father is (her mother doesn’t know either), finds her mother’s diary from 20 years ago and discovers that her mother was intimate with three young men at that time—Sam Carmichael (Pierce Brosnan), Harry Bright (Colin Firth) and Bill Anderson (Stellan Skarsgard), one of whom is her father. Not knowing which one, she invites all three to her wedding and her mother has a fit. See the movie for how it all gets resolved.

Despite getting Golden Globe nominations for Best Picture and Best Actress (Meryl Streep, who else would it be?), Mamma Mia! took a lot of hits at review time, not the least of which was “this must be the only musical in movie history made up almost entirely of people who can’t sing”. It is true that the film did not benefit from having the cast perform its own musical numbers.

Mamma Mia! did not win any major awards worth talking about, but the excellence of Abba’s music and the fun atmosphere of the presentation cannot be denied, which is why I gave it a 3-star (good) rating rather than 2-star (average) rating.

I would rather not hear Pierce Brosnan sing again. You can say anything you want about Meryl Streep, but remember this: She has been nominated as Best Actress or Best Supporting Actress for 14 Academy Awards and has won 2 Oscars, and she also has been nominated for 21 Golden Globe Awards and won 5 times, more than any other actor in the history of either award show.

Don’t fight it, if you want some fun entertainment, see Mamma Mia!

Read more of my movie reviews on films with a lot of substance, depth and feeling, including:
“A Christmas Story” – “My Big Fat Greek Wedding” – “Secondhand Lions” – “The Chorus (Les Choristes in French)” – “Waking Ned Devine” – “Chariots of Fire” – “Steel Magnolias” – “Chocolat” and “Radio”
These are all excellent films.
Find my articles at:
http://www.edbagleyblog.com
http://www.edbagleyblog.com/MovieReviews.html

Tags: , , , , , , ,

18 Jan 10 Why Slumdog Millionaire Is Just Another Mediocre Bollywood Film

Slumdog Millionaire is a bad film, an actor once said in a public platform. He had his reasons and most of them were not far from the truth. Slumdog Millionaire has won an ensemble of Oscars and it is a thing of pride for Bollywood’s best music director A.R.Rahman , lyricist Gulzaar and sound-mixer Resul Pookutty for having won home the glory.. But let us ask ourselves is Slumdog Millionaire really a good movie from Bollywood standards? If yes, then how come Slumdog Millionaire has flopped or been rejected by Indian audiences? Slumdog Millionaire is just another average wanna-be Bollywood film. We are not talking about the poverty aspect which was highlighted by Amitabh Bachchan. We are talking about the movie content purely, which is notches below the standard of what can be called quality film-making. Slumdog Milionaire has the same lost and found formula done to death by Indian film-makers. Haven’t we seen a street urchin becoming a ganglord, in the 70s Bollywood flicks? What is Slumdog Millionaire trying to say? That it is okay to steal shoes from the Taj Mahal? Is this the message that the movie portrays to young children? Also, how comes Anil Kapoor who plays the quiz master so quietly sneaks in Jamal(Dev) to the police? How come there is no uproar? How come the media is never interested? And why will the police unnecessarily grill the boy, give third degree treatment to a someone who has won public adulation and one crore rupees? Not only is the plot far-fetched, there are also clichés galore: Salim and Jamal are muslims, the other musketeer Lathika HAS to be from the other caste, otherwise the plot will not move ahead. When the two boys are separated from Lathika, she HAS to turn into a prostitute. The director is clearly going the clichéd way which has ever been experimented so many times by our Bollywood film-makers. Where is the creativity? If an Indian film-maker had the same film, I seriously doubt the critics would have given the film four or five stars. Jamal grows up to be a ‘chai-wallah’ in a call center. But he answers questions in the ‘Who wants to be a Millionaire’ in the finest UK accent, akin to an MBA grad from UK? I have yet to see a chaiwallah from a call center who speaks such eloquent English. Let’s look at the performances. Anil Kapoor has clearly over-acted in his wanna-be Clint Eastwood accent. Praises and award nominations are being heaped on the dusky Freida Pinto who played Lathika in Slumdog Millionaire. But is it really an engrossing performance? Far from it. Looking overhead from the platform and giving a model pose does not call for an arresting performance. Her real test will lie when she gets to do performance driven roles. A.R.Rahman has given far better music in his previous albums and one rues the fact that the Oscar fraternity completely ignored him for a much superior score in Lagaan. One can sense that the honor is primarily because of a white connection (read Danny Boyle). Though the plot is not really convincing, the treatment of Slumdog Millionaire and the screenplay is admittedly good enough. But that does not mean Bollywood has been bad in screenplays of late. Movies like Rang De Basanti, Dil Chahta Hai, Ghajini and even Gangster were also better if not equal in terms screenplay treatment. So there is nothing in Slumdog Millionaire to feel ‘wow’ about, at least to the people who have grown up on Bollywood films. Also let’s not forget that Slumdog Millionare is essentially an English film, the artistes and some of the crew is Indians. Dyslexia is a major concern in the US, and the truth is the best movie on dyslexia in the world was made by an Indian- Taare Zameen Par. Isn’t it a shame that we are unnecessarily heaping praises on a mediocre film Slumdog Millionaire when a masterpiece like Taare Zameen Par was ignored by the Oscar jury. Let us be practical and assess the quality of movies with a sense of discern. Something which Indians actually did-Slumdog Millionaire is a flop in India.

V.S.ARUNRAJ, in his entertaining blog Bollywood Trends gives a low-down on the news, views, reviews, masala and trends of the biggest and the busiest film industry in the world-Bollywood

Tags: , , , , , ,

18 Jan 10 Movie History: if you Thought “titanic” Was the Largest Grossing Film in the U. S., Think Again

Copyright © 2007 Ed Bagley

A lot of moviegoers think that “Titanic” is the largest grossing domestic film of all time, primarily because of its huge popularity as well as topping $600+ million in revenue following its release in 1997.

In fact, Titanic was the largest grossing domestic film in actual dollars, with Star Wars a distant second at $460+ million in 1977. Because money not only talks but sings and dances as well in our society, we remain impressed by large amounts of money. Not satisfied with this approach, I looked for a more accurate measure to compare and found it in adjusting for inflation. When adjusted for inflation, the actual moneymaking value of films takes on a new look.

Titanic, while No. 1 in actual dollars generated, is only No. 6 when adjusted for inflation.

The real No. 1 largest grossing domestic film in moviemaking history is none other than “Gone with the Wind”, which grossed $198+ million in 1939 but its inflation-adjusted value in today’s money is $1.329 billion (1,329,000,000+).

Here are the Top 25 moneymaking movies when inflation adjusted:

1) Gone with the Wind – $1.329+ billion (actual gross of $198+ million in 1939).

2) Star Wars – $1.172+ billion ($460+ million in 1977).

3) The Sound of Music – $937+ million ($158+ million 1965).

4) E. T.: The Extra-Terrestrial – $933+ million ($435+million in 1982).

5) The Ten Commandments – $861+ million ($65+ million in 1956).

6) Titanic – $844+ million ($600+ million in 1997).

7) Jaws – $842+ million ($260+ million in 1975).


8) Doctor Zhivago – $816+ million ($111+ million in 1965).

9) The Exorcist – $727+ million ($232+ million 1973).

10) Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs – $717+ million ($184+ million in 1937).

11) 101 Dalmatians – $657+ million ($144+ million in 1961).

12) The Empire Strikes Back – $646+ million ($290+ million in 1980).

13) Ben-Hur – $644+ million ($74 million in 1959).

14) Return of the Jedi – $618+ million ($309 million in 1983).

15) The Sting – $586+ million ($156 million in 1973).

16) Raiders of the Lost Ark – $579+ million ($242+ million in 1981).

17) Jurassic Park – $567+ million ($357+ million in 1993).

18) The Graduate – $563+ million ($104+ million in 1967).

19) Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace – $558+ million ($431 million in 1999).

20) Fantasia – $546+ million ($76+ million in 1941).

21) The Godfather – $519+ million ($134+ million in 1972).

22) Forrest Gump – $516+ million ($329+ million in 1994).

23) Mary Poppins – $514+ million ($102+ million in 1964).

24) The Lion King – $508+ million ($328+ million in 1994).

25) Grease – $506+ million ($188+ million in 1978).

Here are 10 more eye-poppers among the Top 100 grossing films when inflation adjusted:

44) Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest – $423+ million ($423+ million in 2006).

46) Blazing Saddles – $416 million ($119+ million in 1974).

55) The Passion of the Christ – $392 million ($370 million in 2004).

62) Smokey and the Bandit – $373+ million ($126+ million in 1977).

69) The Rocky Horror Picture Show – $362+ million ($112+ million in 1975).

70) Rocky – $362+ million ($117 million in 1976).

80) M.A.S.H. – $353+ million ($81+ million in 1970).

81) Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom – $352+ million ($179+ million in 1984).

88) Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl – $333+ million ($305+ million in 2003).

96) Sergeant York – $316+ million ($16+ million in 1941).

All figures are adjusted to the estimated 2007 average ticket price of $6.58. Some of these films had multiple releases; the release date used reflects the year of initial release.

Ed Bagley’s Blog Publishes Original Articles with Analysis and Commentary on 5 Subjects: Sports, Movie Reviews, Lessons in Life, Jobs and Careers, and Internet Marketing. Read my 3-part series on “Secrets Men Don’t Want Women to Know” and reviews on the Broadway musicals “Camelot”, “Chicago” and “The Phantom of the Opera”. These are all excellent films. Find my Blog at:
http://www.edbagleyblog.com
http://www.edbagleyblog.com/MovieReviews.html

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

18 Jan 10 Infocom 0708 marketting film

Corporate film made for INFOCOM 0708.. … Corporate Presentation ABP Anandabazar Debjit Biswas DB&A INFOCOM

Tags: , , ,

16 Jan 10 Q&A With Rajeev Jain, ICS WICA On Film

Q&A With Rajeev Jain, ICS WICA On Film 

Indian Director of Photography, Rajeev Jain, ICS WICA is a Cinematographer based in Mumbai, India. Rajeev specializes in shooting television commercials in the 35mm motion picture film format as well as HD Digital formats. Rajeev started in the early days of the music video revolution, before venturing into narrative filmmaking. His eclectic body of work includes Army, Badhaai Ho Badhaai, Carry on Pandu, Kadachit, Kalpvriksh – The Wish Tree, Mirabai Notout,  Pyar Mein Kabhi Kabhi and Rasstar .

QUESTION: Where were you born and raised?

RAJEEV: I was born in Lucknow, India. There was no seminal event that happened to me as a young person that made me want to be a cinematographer. It certainly wasn’t the quality of the light in Lucknow. I remember it was gray; was stained brown from the traffic and the sky dark. But as I say that, I realize the suppressed palette of the place did affect me emotionally. Saturates leaped out against that neutrals, as in a dream or a post-industrial nightmare.

QUESTION: What did your parents do?

RAJEEV: My parents were just ordinary folks. I don’t think they were particularly ambitious for me. Their main concern, I think, was that I wasn’t an embarrassment. We moved to the Etawah and then back to Lucknow, where I completed my education. My degrees were in Theatre Arts.

QUESTION: Did you have a career goal at that point in life?

RAJEEV: I wanted to be a writer, but like Mohan Rakesh I thought too much and wrote too little. That is too say I was more a reader then a writer, more academician then poet. I got very interested in semiology and structuralism (the study of how language encodes ideas). Initially I studied how the spoken and written language worked, but then became more interested in how codes worked in other languages, like the language of film. My interest in film language led me in a rather convoluted way to cinematography.

QUESTION: That’s interesting. Can you be a little more specific?

RAJEEV: I became very interested in understanding how in altering light, composition, camera angles and camera movement a cinematographer alters an audiences perception of the visual event, and thereby the audience’s emotional response. It is a difficult thing to quantify. I remember specifically thinking back to seeing Pather Panchali  when I was a child, and how its images had always remained in my imagination, not only for their pure beauty and sublime scale, but because they affected me emotionally, striking some unconscious but responsive cord. Later I saw Ray’s “The Apu Trilogy”. I had much the same response, but now my understanding was informed by my studies. It would be accurate to say that the cinematographers of these two films, Subroto Mitra, were those who most influenced my decision to become a cinematographer.

QUESTION: How did you make a connection between words and photography?

RAJEEV: In writing essays and articles about film. I realized that film images worked very much the way the spoken/written language works. You want to express certain ideas. There are culturally agreed and understood codas. These shapes, which we call letters, have agreed upon pronunciations. These letters form words. These words have agreed meanings. But it is of course arbitrary. The word “cat” has no innate “catness” about it, but on hearing this word the listener forms an idea in their brain. A cat. We can then add adjectives, and qualifiers, to make it a black cat, or an angry black cat. These words are codes, but not universal codes. They are specific to a culture that shares that language. Photography in some respects is a much more complex language system. The denotative (specific) or connotative (symbolic or implied) meaning of an image can be ambiguous, but also complex. Perhaps the best literary analogy is the Haiku poem. The fewer words have greater potential meaning — the more words that are added in longer literary forms, the more specific the meaning. An image offers both specific and non-specific meanings. It can work on many layers, conscious and not.

QUESTION: Did you have any mentors or were you totally self-taught?

RAJEEV: I’ve learned a lot from other DP’s. But it’s mainly from studying their work. Ashok Mehta and I talk a lot, and he’s given me a great deal. But I was self-taught. I studied art extensively, particularly early 20th century artists, and late 19th century artists. I learned a lot about light from them. I’ve stolen an idea from every good film I’ve seen, probably. Particularly the work of  Subroto Mitra (ISC), Ashok Mehta (ISC), Binod Pradhan, and Santosh Sivan (ISC).

QUESTION: Do you think of yourself as an artist, a technician or both?

RAJEEV: I think that’s a very important distinction. I don’t want to sound pretentious, but if you consider the nature of art, it is meant to give us new eyes to see the world. I want audiences to respond viscerally to what our intentions are for a film. I think that cinematography works very much like music in that it is difficult for us to measure or quantify why audiences respond to what we do. So it is an art. And its practitioners must therefore be artists.

QUESTION: Tell us more about your analogy of music and cinematography.

RAJEEV: I can sit in dailies and I can see the other people watching the film with me respond physically and emotionally to the images; but it is very difficult quantifying what they are responding to. If you watch people listening to music, they may also respond, but you would hard put to quantify why they are responding.

QUESTION: I’ll borrow a phrase from Subroto Mitra, who said, cinematographers are the authors of the images. But, that isn’t widely recognized.

RAJEEV: Part of the problem lies with our collective culture. Films are reviewed as theatre rather than as a unique art form. Critics will talk about scripts and performances. They talk about things they understand, but they understand them because their own cultural antecedents are principally in traditional theatre, though they may not recognize that. In this context, cinematography and music aren’t understood, except to say they were beautiful, because there is not a particular language developed within criticism for their description. Unfortunately, many reviewers don’t recognize how decisions made by the director, cinematographer and composer made a profound impact on the visceral reactions and intellectual responses of audiences. I’m not saying that cinematographers aren’t recognized. We are, at least within the industry, but not in the consumer press. I don’t think I read a single review that mentioned the significance of Subroto Mitra’s (ISC) decision to use 16mm film and other formats in certain scenes in The River, yet that made a profound impact. I consider that a significant artistic decision worthy of comment, in fact, essential to an audiences understanding of the film’s artistic treatment.

QUESTION: The collaboration between directors and cinematographers is unique.

RAJEEV: An important thing about that collaboration is that cinematographers have to integrate their vision for a film with the director’s vision.

QUESTION: Do the many music videos you shot influence you today?

RAJEEV: Not really. None of my films look like music videos, but the great thing about music videos was that we could experiment with different lighting, film stocks, lenses and filters. We would decide to try putting four filters on the lens, force process the film, or put a negative through a reversal film postproduction process to see how it comes out, and then try it again the other way around. It was a great way to learn.

QUESTION: Are there other cinematographers whose work you follow?

RAJEEV: I can mention all the obvious names, but the truth is I learn from all cinematographers. I can watch a television program shot by a 29-year-old cinematographer and find something that he or she did that is quite interesting. I’m constantly learning from other people. I still read every magazine and journal about cinematography and photography that I can lay my hands on. I still study art. I collect books of photographers and paintings. But it’s not just the good work that others do that I learn from. I learn from my own mistakes that I have had ample opportunity to make over these last 20 years. When my son Adam was in the seventh grade, he wrote an essay in which he was required to say who his hero was. He said it was me. “My father is my hero because he messes up all the time, and he lets me see it.” So I feel o.k. about messing up. I think that’s a hugely important lesson to learn. It’s o.k. to mess up, and you will sometimes mess up if you’re willing to push the limits of your craft.

QUESTION: Did any other mentors influence your thinking?

RAJEEV: I was a graduate from the University of Lucknow for a short while. That’s where I met Renu Saluja who was a really important mentor. She pointed me down some really interesting avenues as regards film theory.

QUESTION: How do you decide that something is a film you want to do?

RAJEEV: Early in my career anything that was offered was a film I wanted to do. Today, two things are likely to affect my decision. One is my first meeting with the director. That relationship is like a marriage only, oddly, much more intense. You have to decide whether you’re going to be able to get along with that person for the long time that you’re going to be together. I think I have gotten along well with over 90 percent of the directors I have worked with, and many have remained friends. The second thing is the photography. I’m always interested in doing new and different things. If the project is very much like what I have done before, and the script is not great, then it is less likely I will be interested. Sometimes a project comes along that is just so interesting it is impossible to resist.

QUESTION: What do you tell students and other young filmmakers when they ask you to share the secret of success? Do you tell them the truth about the odds?

RAJEEV: I think you have to be patient, and not let yourself believe that things are going to happen quickly. You need integrity and honesty about who you want to become. That way, even if you fail, you can fail with some dignity. If you compromise and fail, what do you have left?

Kahiu is the nominated author of the non-fiction books.

Tags: , , ,

14 Jan 10 “tipping the Velvet” is First Alternative Lifestyle Film With an Educational Message – Part 1

Copyright © 2007 Ed Bagley

Tipping the Velvet – 4 Stars (Excellent)

“Tipping the Velvet” is what some viewers would consider a terrible film about a sinful, raunchy lifestyle, and what I would consider an excellent film despite any apparent raunchiness.

After writing 135 reviews, including what I would consider 8 alternative lifestyle films, Tipping the Velvet is the absolute best film and only the second film among the 8 in this genre that I would recommend seeing.

Here are the films I considered terrible and the reasons why. I gave a “1 Star – Terrible Rating” to these 6 films:

“Boys Don’t Cry” which won Hilary Swank a Best Actress Oscar for her performance as Brandon Teena, a transgendered teen who was born a woman named Teena Brandon who preferred life as a male and lived as a male until it was discovered that “he” was born female. This film had a very tragic ending.

“Ed Wood” which was the real life story of Ed Wood, known as the worst film director in Hollywood history. He liked to dress in women’s clothes while directing low-budget, absolutely terrible films.

“Imagine Me & You” shows a bride at the altar simply looking at another woman and starting an awakening that leads to the destruction of her marriage and living happily ever after with her new lesbian partner.

“Myra Breckenridge” is Gore Vidal’s controversial film about Myron Breckenridge, a man who goes to Europe for a sex change operation and comes back as Myra Breckenridge, a man-hating woman.

“The Rocky Horror Picture Show” finds a newly engaged couple whose car breaks down and they seek help from a Transylvanian transvestite involved in a bizarre lifestyle.

This was one of Susan Sarandon’s early films; she would later earn 4 Academy Award nominations for Best Actress, and an Oscar for her role in “Dead Man Walking”.

“Transamerica” which won Felicity Huffman a Best Actress Oscar nomination and a Best Actress Golden Globe Award for her performance as Bree, a pre-operative male-to-female transsexual who takes an unexpected journey from Los Angeles to New York when she learns that she fathered a son earlier in life.

Receiving my “2 Star – Average Rating” were:

“The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert” which has two drag queens and a transsexual driving a lavender bus named Priscilla across the Australian desert to a gig at an isolated resort.

“Breakfast on Pluto” is a gender preference movie about a boy who really wants to be a girl, and settles for being a transvestite trying to find a place in a world that curses his very existence.

The best of these 8 films is Breakfast on Pluto, which has Irish actor Cillian Murphy in the role of Patrick “Kitten” Braden. I recommend seeing Breakfast on Pluto as it is far better than the other 7 films, and Cillian Murphy proves passable as a woman and gives a great performance.

All of these films are controversial due to their subject matter.

It is very difficult to make a great film.

It is difficult to make a good film.

It is almost impossible to make a good film when the subject matter is not even on the radar acceptance screen of the average viewer.

Alternative lifestyle films do not win awards even if the actors involved get an Oscar (as Hilary Swank did in Boys Don’t Cry), get nominated for an Oscar (as Felicity Huffman did in Transamerica) or get nominated for a Golden Globe (as Cillian Murphy did in Breakfast on Pluto).

The typical moviegoer does not want to talk about alternative lifestyles much less see them. We are uncomfortable with what we do not know or understand.

There will be no great acceptance for alternative films now or in the distant future. Hollywood is OK with accepting alternative lifestyles, but Hollywood is generally far more liberal, permissive and self-absorbed than mainstream America.

A big part of the acceptance problem is the Hollywood filmmakers. Producers of alternative lifestyle films have millions of moviegoers glued to their presentation, but they continually fail to deliver an important message involving understanding and knowledge.

With a laser beam on sensationalism and the cash register, Hollywood filmmakers would have us believe that it is impossible to tell a good alternative lifestyle story with significant meaning without using intensely brutal rape scenes, sexuality, filthy language, drug usage and murder.

All of these aforementioned events only reinforce all of the stereotypes, prejudices, bigotry, stupidity and transphobia already present in our society and culture.

I am not sure what the phobia is for transgendered people so I simply created transphobia because homophobia means an extreme and irrational aversion to homosexuality and homosexual people, which is not what we are talking about here.

And then there is Tipping the Velvet which does exactly that: tell a good alternative lifestyle story with significant meaning.

Just as Breakfast on Pluto is a good film made in Ireland, Tipping the Velvet is an excellent film produced in England for the BBC (British Broadcasting Company) by Sally Head Production.

The BBC brought this controversial movie to a 5-millon strong mainstream television audience. An American filmmaker has not yet been able to produce a quality alternative lifestyle film for television. Tipping the Velvet is really three stories in one as it was originally aired in three parts and runs 2 hours and 57 minutes.

(Editor’s Note: This is Part 1 of a 2-Part Review.)

Ed Bagley’s Blog Publishes Original Articles with Analysis and Commentary on 5 Subjects: Sports, Movie Reviews, Lessons in Life, Jobs and Careers, and Internet Marketing. Read my 3-part series on “Secrets Men Don’t Want Women to Know” and reviews on the Broadway musicals “Camelot”, “Chicago” and “The Phantom of the Opera”. These are all excellent films. Find my Blog at:
http://www.edbagleyblog.com
http://www.edbagleyblog.com/MovieReviews.html

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

12 Jan 10 MUNDE UK DE ( NEW PUNJABI FILM OF AMRINDER GILL ND JIMMY SHERGILL )

1ST TIME OUR GREAT SINGER AMRINDER GILL ND OUR GREAT ACTOR JIMMY SHERGILL COMING TOGETHER IN MUNDE UK DE THEY GONNA ROCK

Tags: , , , , , ,

12 Jan 10 A CANDID INTERVIEW WITH FILM STAR ACTOR JACK KLUGMAN

As Baby Boomer Women’s Editor, I interviewed film star Jack Klugman, who has been in our lives and homes since we were very young. Starting from the early days of live television, his TV and movie credits occupy more than eight pages and span every decade from the 1950s through the present. They include such important movies as 12 Angry Men and Days of Wine and Roses, and popular television shows like Playhouse 90, Kraft Television Theatre, The Alcoa Hour, General Electric Theatre, Naked City, The Twilight Zone, Ben Casey, The Fugitive, The Dean Martin Show, The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson, Bob Hope Presents the Chrysler Theatre, The Mike Douglas Show, The Carol Burnett Show, This is Your Life, The Love Boat, Quincy and many others.

Mr. Klugman is perhaps best remembered for his lovable, true-to-life portrayal of the character of Oscar Madison in the 1970s TV hit series, The Odd Couple, for which he won two Emmy Awards. After losing his longtime acting partner and best friend, Tony Randall, in the spring of 2004, Mr. Klugman decided to write Tony and Me—A Story of Friendship, the subject of this interview. Here is a glimpse of Jack Klugman’s new book and a peek inside the life and mind of this remarkable celebrity.

Linda: I searched all the county libraries for your new book, Tony and Me, but found that every copy was taken with a one-month waiting list to receive the book. Then I called three or four Borders BookStores. Every store was sold out; until I finally located one remaining copy 15 miles away. How does it feel to be the author of a book that is rapidly gaining such popularity and what is your reaction to all of this?

Jack Klugman: It’s very exciting that the book is starting to take off, of course. But what has been even more satisfying is the response I’ve been getting from the people. I just finished a 19-city book tour and everywhere I went there was this tremendous out-pouring of love. People not only remember Tony and me, there’s still a lot of affection for us. At 83, it’s incredibly gratifying to know that you are not only still remembered, but loved and respected. That has been a tremendous gift.

Linda: Why did you decide to write Tony and me, was it difficult, and how did you first go about it?

Jack Klugman: It wasn’t as much a decision to write the book as it was a working through of my feelings about Tony’s death. When your best buddy in the foxhole next to you gets hit, it immediately raises the issue of your own mortality. Suddenly you’re on a short list that is getting shorter all the time. I wanted to make sure that I had told the world what my friendship with Tony Randall had done for my life before my own number came up.

Linda: The DVD of The Odd Couple out-takes is hilarious. How did you select clips for this DVD and why did you decide to include a DVD with the book?

Jack Klugman: I included the DVD with Tony and Me because I thought fans would get a big kick out them. My son Adam, who also published the book with me, was a film editor for many years and so he and I put it together in his studio. We had so much fun that we laughed ourselves sick during the process.

Linda: As pioneers of early television, you and Tony Randall are icons to the baby boomer generation. You’ve been in our living rooms for decades. We grew up watching you both on Playhouse 90, The Kraft Television Theatre, The Alcoa Hour, Mr. Peepers, Alfred Hitchcock Presents, Gunsmoke, The Johnny Carson Show, What’s My Line, The Odd Couple, Quincy, and a host of other programs too lengthy to mention. Can you describe to us what the early days of “live” television were like—perhaps tell us about a most memorable live show or a moment that you remember?

Jack Klugman: There was nothing in the world like the early days of live television. It combined everything I love about the theatre with the potential to reach millions of people. It really was amazing. I was young and building a career in a fledgling industry. It was the most exciting time in my life.

Linda: In the book you talk about being the tough guy from South Philadelphia who ended up studying acting at Carnegie Tech just to get out of town to escape a gambling debt. You mention your first acting experience at school and how you were so nervous before going on stage. But then you discovered that when you stepped out onto the stage you felt more comfortable there than you were in real life. You say that that’s still true today. Can you tell us what you mean by this and why it is so?

Jack Klugman: I’ve never been comfortable in my own skin, especially when it comes to social things. I’m truly a loner and for many, many years I refused to trust anyone completely. That made it difficult for me to be around people. A lot of that has changed now, largely because of my relationship with Tony. But at the time I discovered acting, it was like being unchained from my personality. I was free. Acting had made me free because I was more comfortable on the stage than I ever been in life. It never occurred to me I would make my living as an actor. I would have done it for nothing.

Linda: When people talk about why the TV show, The Odd Couple, was so successful they often mention how true-to-character you and Tony Randall seemed to be. He was the straight-laced, artsy fusspot and you were the messier, bold, tell-it-like-it-is guy. People saw the two of you as portraying complete opposites—and very convincingly. But in the book you say that it was not the differences between you and Tony that made the show a success, but your similarities. What did you mean by that? In what ways were you and Tony Randall similar?

Jack Klugman: We were opposite in a million ways, many of them consistent with the characters we played on The Odd Couple. But we were similar in one, very important way: we both loved acting. We were both trained actors who had spent many years learning our craft and it bonded us in spite of our differences. It gave us a way to work together that lasted a lifetime.

Linda: You mention in the book that Walter Matthau played the first Oscar in The Odd Couple on Broadway, with Art Carney. He received fifty-eight hundred dollars a week (and you say he deserved it). But when he had to leave to do a movie, Neil Simon’s brother asked you to do the part. Although you were packing the house, the producer refused to give you the five hundred dollars a week raise you wanted. So you quit the show. It takes a lot of guts to quit a big Broadway show. In your various acting roles you often portrayed a tough guy with a lot of confidence. Do you feel you have that kind of confidence? How did you walk away from the role and, looking back, would you do it again?

Jack Klugman: Absolutely. An actor has to stand for what he/she thinks she’s worth. It’s a tough business that chews people up by constantly making them feel unworthy. If you want to be successful, in any business, you have to be willing to blow the job if you’re not getting what you think you are worth. Set your own value and then be willing to walk away. I’ve lost some opportunities that way, but I always remained in control of my own value. In the end, it’s the most attractive thing in the world.

Linda: You describe how you eventually landed the role of Oscar Madison in the 1970s TV show, The Odd Couple. Co-Executive Producer Garry Marshall saw you on stage opposite the great Ethel Merman in Gypsey. She was singing to you and spitting in your face, on your clothes and in your eyes, but you never flinched. That is how he decided you were a “good actor” and gave you the role. We’d like to know what it’s like to do a Broadway play, especially with someone like Ethel Merman. How did your on-stage Broadway performances compare with later TV and movie roles?

Jack Klugman: It’s all acting to me! It doesn’t matter what I’m working on, I take the same approach. However, I prefer the theatre because I can rehearse. Rehearsal is for actors what re-writing is for writers—a chance to perfect your art. For actors, the only place you can do that is in the theatre.

Linda: You humorously describe how you and Tony Randall could not even share the same limo when you first got together to do the TV series, The Odd Couple—you were smoking and Tony was violently against it, so you each threatened to quit. But the relationship that developed between the two of you quickly became one of mutual respect and true friendship. In the book you are very complimentary of Tony Randall in every respect—as an actor, a family man, and a human being. You say that Tony taught you about good improvisation—it is about provoking the other actor into a response. Can you tell us how the two of you went from a couple who were truly “at odds” to a couple completely “in sync”?

Jack Klugman: We were never really at odds, although our styles were very different. The trust we established over time was the result of professional attitudes and the respect we showed one another. When I got throat cancer, however, is when I found out the kind of friend Tony was. If there was any turning point in our friendship, it would have been the moment he walked into the hospital after my throat operation. He made a commitment to stand by my side and he never left.

Linda: You describe Tony Randall’s roll in designing your comeback after throat cancer. He was your first visitor in the hospital and was deeply concerned with your getting back your voice and returning to work. You seemed surprised at Tony’s compassion and say that it changed your life. He coaxed you into an on-stage performance of The Odd Couple to benefit the National Actors Theatre (which Tony founded). You were uncertain that you could do it, but you worked on getting your voice back and managed to get through the performance with Tony’s help. You describe how Tony’s eyes lit up every time you got a laugh; how he “pulled you through” your comeback performance. In your words, “you never trusted another person as much as you did Tony that night.” Can you tell us a little about what this meant to you and why it was such an important moment in your life?

Jack Klugman: I’m going to let people read the book to get that answer.

Linda: I marvel at the many compliments you give to your best friend, Tony Randall, in the book. You say that he had a “presence”—a presence that you can’t fake, you can’t learn, you either have it or you don’t. You say that “Tony had it in spades.” What do you mean by that?

Jack Klugman: Talent, presence, charisma—these are natural gifts that can’t be taught. Technique made the most of Tony’s God-given abilities, but he was a compelling person to watch perform not because of anything he learned. It was because he had a performer’s gift in his bones.

Linda: Growing up in a tough Philadelphia neighborhood with repressed Jewish immigrants, you learned to protect yourself. You say in the book that only Tony’s friendship gave you the capacity to truly trust another human being. You mention “living in a shell” before knowing him and say you can’t help wondering what you missed for all those lost years. You regret that you didn’t get to tell Tony what he meant to you before he died. You say that he made you a better father, that now you let your children “inside,” and you’re “not afraid to let them see you as you are.” Those are all powerful words and a great tribute to what your acting partner and dearest friend, Tony Randall. meant to you. Can you tell us the one thing about him that meant the most to you?

Jack Klugman: Loyalty. Tony was the most loyal man I ever knew. And there is no single ingredient more important to a successful friendship than loyalty.

Linda: Thank you for your time and sincerity in speaking to us. We’ve always loved the person you played in your roles, we love the real person we’ve gotten to know from your new book, Tony and Me, and we celebrate your poignant story of how true friendship can be life-changing, far surpassing fame, fortune, and any other of life’s successes. We hope to see you on TV again soon, promoting this book and acting in new roles. We wish you continued good health and longevity, good fortune and perhaps another great book in the near future.

Linda Sittler is a freelance writer whose bio and articles appear on Boomers International Website, http://www.bookstoretoday.com/
Copyright © 1995 – 2006 Boomers International ™,
All rights reserved.

Did you find this article useful? For more useful tips and hints, points to ponder and keep in mind, techniques, and insights pertaining to Internet Business, do please browse for more information at our websites.
http://www.allhottips.com
http://www.bookstoretoday.com

Tags: , , , , , ,

term life insurance quote , hydraulic exercise equipment,chicago personal injury lawyer , bad credit mortgage ,life insurance comparison ,

Powered by Yahoo! Answers